TIAA Henderson Real Estates' (TH) plans for the new St James Quarter suddenly became a lot clearer during yesterday's 'Information Forum' at the Glasshouse on Greenside.
Spurtle was excited by what was on view, and encountered nothing but helpful charm throughout the event.
However, we treat all such corporate persuasiveness with dollops of caution, and so should you. Here's what we think we've winkled out so far.
Building a hotel in the middle of Picardy Place is NOT part of TH’s plans. Whether or not a new hotel is eventually consented for this site will definitely not affect TH's decision to go ahead with the St James Quarter.
Spurtle thinks this line is substantially different to the one spun so far (Breaking news, 9.12.13).
Up to now, locals have been briefed that Thistle Hotels enjoyed a watertight lease on its St James Hotel fronting Leith Street, and would not budge without being found a new home nearby. Its remaining in place was said to be a spanner in the works for developing the rest of the St James Quarter. Redeveloping the St James Quarter could not progress without a new base for the hotel, and the best place for it was plumb-centre in Picardy Place.
So, suddenly, the widely 'understood' problem about the St James Hotel finding a new home turns out not to have been a problem at all. How could such a misunderstanding possibly have arisen and who may have encouraged it?
We will ask City of Edinburgh Council – owner of the land around Picardy Place – if any department can shed light on the mystery.*
This matters a lot to locals, planning activists, community councillors, politicians and others wondering how and where to apply the right pressure to achieve the right future for Picardy Place.
If an £850m development next door is not after all in jeopardy, CEC should be a lot more persuadable. They should, indeed, be spending more time asking Edinburgh people what they want here.
Now, call us suspicious, but we're a tad uncomfortable about the gap between TH unexpectedly not being involved in Picardy Place at present, and a spokesman's comment that it could potentially become involved later. Which is it and under what circumstances?
A major redevelopment of John Lewis seems likely to accompany creation of the St James Quarter.
We hear John Lewis proposes to increase its gross floorspace from 300,000 square feet to 320,000 square feet.
Significantly, this would involve increasing ‘customer-facing floorspace’ from 140,000 square feet to 180,000 square feet, this potentially being achieved by changing internal floor-plates and escalator positions, and by extending the overall footprint of the shop.
A new extension is also envisaged south-eastwards into Leith Street (where the raised, paved flower-bed stands now in the shadow of the bridge). The current Brutalist concrete frontage would be lost to view.
To put it mildly, none of that sounds like business as usual. Proposals for John Lewis are apparently under discussion and very fluid.
COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDERS
Compulsory purchases of listed buildings have come to light in the last 3 months, but plans for them are only now becoming clear. Edinburgh-based conservation architects Purcell Miller Tritton are in charge of the new designs.
The John Lewis Collection Centre service could disappear somewhere interesting, underground, and accessible by car.
The converted building (a former church) would then house the St James Quarter's management on upper floors, and a restaurant and café at ground- and first-floor levels.
A glass cube projecting from the south-east elevation would extend these activities towards a new (quite small) public square/‘urban space’ (currently a car park) adjacent to Café Camino.
These 18th-century tenements along James Craig Walk are currently student housing.
Stair and plate entrances to the original ground floor (today’s first floor) would be restored. Access to three new ‘exclusive’ retail outlets would be supplemented by more accessible entrances at the current ground floor.
Upper floors would become residential.
Restored mansard roofs and original chimney heights would replace 1970s flat roofs.
The new St James Quarter could have 1,650 car parking spaces. Two-thirds of entries and one-third of exits are projected to be via York Place. One-third of entries and two-thirds of exits are projected to be via Leith Street. Residents would have a discrete entry/exit onto Picardy Place.
A new pedestrian crossing would connect the St James Centre to the Greenside car park across Leith Street.
Little King Street would be reserved for pedestrians and cyclists. Pedestrians and dismounted cyclists could cross through the St James Quarter 24 hours a day.
Displaced traffic during the construction phase will, we predict, cause disruption to Broughton and the New Town equal to if not greater than that experienced during tramworks. It may well force a delay to any implementation of partial pedestrianisation of George Street.
- 2015 Detailed planning approvals; St James Centre closes; demoliton begins.
- 2016 Retail construction starts.
- 2020 Retail and leisure units open; completion of hotel and residential units.
'FACTS AND FIGURES'
- Total development size: 1.7m square feet.
- Total retail space: 1m square feet.
- A luxury hotel and possible apartment hotel.
- Up to 250 new homes (but only 143 currently planned).
- A new cinema, conveniently situated over the road from an existing cinema complex.
- Covered, 209m-long, indoor high-street.
- Three new 'public squares'.
A Council spokesperson, said: 'The Council owns land at Picardy Place and is currently looking at how best to utilise this asset. Updates on this work will be reported to Council committees in the next few months'.
It is not a statement of startling transparency. However, we're sure CEC officials will be interested to hear how Spurtle readers would like best to utilise Picardy Place. Send us your blue-sky thoughts at email@example.com and @theSpurtle and Facebook